Context for The Emerging Missional Church

Posted by marcus

November 5, 2005

Context - Culture >>we are living in a changing world. We did a very short brainstorming exercise to identify some of the changes we’re seeing in culture – particularly looking at those that impact the way we do church.Some of the changes identified (to name a few of many) included new ways of:* Learning/Thinking – I now spend as much time online interacting with others and reading article when I work on essays as I do reading books.* Communicating – the immediacy of online communication is having major impact on how we communicate.* Building Community/Relationships – again online interaction and the ease with which we travel is having a big impact upon many of our primary relationships. Along side this the changing nature of family etc.* Views of Institutions – more and more institutions are being viewed with suspicion. The church is just one institution dealing with this.* Understanding the global context …..etcContext - The Church>>We are seeing significant trends emerging in churches that we can no longer ignore and need to grapple with. They include:* Overall decline in Church Attendance - The percentage of the Australian population that identifies themselves with a denomination or local church is continuing to decline.* Non church going Christians as a growing segment of the Christian population. (this is a fast growing segment of the Body of Christ)* Young Adults haemorrhaging from the church. We are ok at doing relevant youth ministry, but the transition to young adulthood sees large numbers of people leaving the church. The stats show us that in previous decades they would return to the church as they had families (in their 20s and 30s), recent indications are that this is no longer so – they are staying away.* ‘The Church is a Joke’. Yes I shared my previous entry – ‘Jo’s Joke’. This represents message that I’m hearing more and more. In the past month I’d been told the same thing by three separate individuals.* There is a growing segment of the population in Australia (and across the West I suspect) that are culturally distanced from the Church and the way in which it operates. 30% of our population are associated with church on some level. 10% of the population are ‘like us’ culturally – ie they talk like us, are open to some of the things we do like group singing to contemporary easy listening light pop music, they have similar moral codes to us. This leaves around 60% of the population here in Australia are culturally closed off or removed from the way the majority of the churches in our country operate. They are people like ‘Jo’.* Most of the Church’s effort goes into reaching out to those who are ‘like us’. Where do the majority of churches put most of their energies, resources and mission? Well apart from the vast amount of energy that we put into the already churched (just ask yourself how much time we put into the preparation of our services, pastoral care etc), most of us are doing mission that aims at the 10% who are ‘like us’. I’m no business person, but this doesn’t seem like a very smart strategy. Very few churches are experimenting with ways of connecting with the vast majority (and growing segment) of the population.Context - The Church’s Response >>How has the church responded to the changes in our world and the growing cultural distance? There have been a number of movements that come to mind:* Contemporary Worship – Worship in the language of the people. New styles of music that people can relate to, more every day language being used in songs etc.* Seeker Sensitive Services – Communicating the gospel in a language that the ordinary person will understanding. Using multimedia and the arts (often secular) to communicate the messages of Jesus.* Alpha like programs – systems of explaining the gospel in relevant language.* Alternative worship – exploring new (and ancient) and creative forms of worship that are more indigenous to culture.Now hear me right please – I am not attacking or downgrading the importance of any of these methods. I have personally been deeply affected by each of these approaches and know of many others who have come to faith and grown in their understanding of God through each. They are each valid responses to the post-modern world we find ourselves living in.However (there is always a ‘but’), I wonder (please hold back your stones now) if perhaps these above approaches might still be largely aiming their efforts on the 10% of the population that are ‘like us’ culturally.You see the interesting thing about each of the above movements/approaches is that they all seem to be about improving the way we do things with the hope that if we do, people will come to us. They all seem to me to be rather attractional – if we build it – and its good enough – they will come.Jesus says – ‘Go into all the world and make disciples’. He says, ‘You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and to the Ends of the Earth’.I’m struggling to find a place where he says, ‘build it and they will come’.Formation of the Livingroom >>at this point I simply shared my own personal journey of coming to the place of planting the Livingroom. I’ve previously written about it here and here.Livingroom Core Journeys >>As part of this journey we discovered the three core values/dna that will centre everything we do upon. I’ve previously written about them in quite a bit of detail - they are the Inner, Outer and Together Journey.Livingroom – Some Specifics >>I shared then about some of what we do at Livingroom, some of the things we’ve experimented with etc. Much of it I’ve shared previously on this blog – I’ve provided links for each where I could find them.* Gatherings* Participatory - BYO Worship* Micro Groups - Renovare* Ignition* Redemptive Parties* Growth through Multiplication - also here* Storytelling – a lot of our formation came out of storytelling. This continues to be central in a lot of what we do – largely informally.* Fragility – We are very fragile. This is both one of our greatest strengths and causes for fear!Global Trends >>In addition to these features of Livingroom, some of the trends and characteristics of Emerging/Missional Church that I see in the global movement include:* Culturally Savvy/Incarnational – take culture very seriously* Participatory – all are encouraged to participate/lead* Bi-vocational Leadership – Many are lead by leaders with other work/focus* Attached Businesses – Many are exploring models of business that not only fund what they do but provide proximity spaces to connect missionally* Ancient/Future – exploring both ancient and new ways of praying and engaging with Scripture* Question Everything – Scary sometimes but a life giving process* Creativity – The Arts and outside the box thinking are central* Food/Celebration – the meal features in many emerging churches* Practices – Amidst the messiness/chaos of these grass roots communities many are exploring simple disciplines/practices that draw them back to their core values and help them to live them out in daily life* Networked – denominations feature less and local and global networks are emerging for support, accountability and shared learning* Dissatisfaction – many have an element of angst/frustration/dissatisfaction with ‘the church’. As with sand in an pearl producing oyster this is healthy, but shouldn’t become the primary reason for the existence of the group – the challenge is to do something positive with the angst and birth something new.Of course this is only a partial and sweepingly generalised list. This is a pretty similar list to what Steve Taylor came up with in his A – Z of Emerging Church article. I actually handed out copies of this article. He says it better than I could!Looking Forward >>In finishing up I wanted to encourage the group to keep the conversation alive. The fact that they are grappling the issue as a denomination and actually funding groups like Livingroom is really progressive. When I share with others around the globe how they support us I get the feeling that many denominations are not willing to engage with this stuff. Its inspiring to be a part of such a permission giving group who not only let us dream, but back us with resources and logistical support however they can. My encouragement was to keep moving forward, keep giving permission, talking up the issues with the wider denominational community and keep exploring ways to resource and develop leaders and groups.Throughout the session (1.5 hours) we have quite a bit of discussion, questions and throwing around ideas. Over all it was very well received and I’ve come away feeling very positive about the experience. I guess now the question remains what we’ll all do with the conversation. Looking forward to seeing what emerges.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.